In fact it would defeat the purpose if we add a license header to this file. It's a serialized object graph from a previous version of MetaModel and it's purpose as a test-resource is to test that we can deserialize legacy object graphs if needed (some MetaModel applications are relying on that).
Best regards, Kasper ________________________________________ From: Henry Saputra [henry.sapu...@gmail.com] Sent: 04 May 2014 02:20 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel incubating 4.1.0-RC1 Hi Justin, We had this discussion before I think the conclusion is that as long as long it is generated from internal source and not 3rd party it is allowed. Someone else from IPMC could help clarifying this. - Henry On Saturday, May 3, 2014, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +0 (binding) if the binary file question (see below) can be answered I'd > vote +1 > > Signatures and hashes all good > DISCLAIMER correct > Filename contains "incubating" > NOTICE and LICENCE good (note that the year is wrong) > All source file have correct headers (there's a few .csv, .xml and .txt > files without headers that you may want to fix in a later release) > Can compile from source > > I did notice a couple of binary files in the release - there's no jars or > the like and most seem to be excel test files or similar. But the following > file looks like a serialised java class - is that allowed? > > > MetaModel-4.1.0-RC1-incubating/core/src/test/resources/metamodel-3.0-default-row.ser > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
