On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that >> podlings.xml has been updated. >> >> Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others >> (Awf) don't. >> >> Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the >> podling has been retired. >> >> As well as updating the News section of the status pages, I think it >> would be worth considering adding an obvious banner to the start of >> the status page: >> >> And perhaps add a banner to the web pages, similar to what is done for >> Atiic projects, for example: >> >> http://harmony.apache.org/ > > This was discussed back in 2011. > > http://markmail.org/message/7t7iv66wgv5nug5m > > Consensus coalesced around Christian Grobmeier's suggestion that we introduce > a redirect to the podling status page. > > Apparently we still need to do the work of puttting in the redirects for a > number of retired podlings.
That's much easier to do than updating the website. I'll add the missing redirects. And once that has been done, the contents won't be accessible externally so such websites can presumably then be deleted? > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
