Hi Enis, thx for the Vote.

There was already "commitment" from James to fix the disclaimer so I would
not think this should be a release blocker.

Thx,

Henry

On Wednesday, March 12, 2014, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding).
>
> - Checked the src and binary artifacts.
> - Checked sigs
> - Checked CRCs
> - Built the src artifacts
>
> If the DISCLAIMER file will not sink the RC, lets go ahead with releasing
> this. Otherwise we would need a new RC.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:11 AM, James Taylor 
> <jamestay...@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Marvin. We'll update this in our next release too, as we'd like
> to
> > follow the preferred path.
> >
> > With these changes for our next release, are we good to go for this
> > release?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey 
> > <mar...@rectangular.com<javascript:;>
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:18 AM, James Taylor 
> > > <jamestay...@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Also, should we drop the ".txt"
> > > > extension on the NOTICE and LICENSE files for our next release?
> > >
> > >   http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name
> > >
> > >   Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt?
> > >
> > >     This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be
> called
> > >     LICENSE and NOTICE.
> > >
> > > Marvin Humphrey
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > > general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > > general-h...@incubator.apache.org<javascript:;>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to