-1 (non-binding)

I am sorry, but Pig on Tez is broken with this RC. My understanding is
that MRInputSplitDistributor
that Pig is using is broken in this RC, and without fixing it, Pig on
Tez doesn't work at all. The Pig team would like to use this release to
deploy Pig on Tez soon, and we think this is a serious bug to roll another
RC.

Do you mind including the fix in a new RC?


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> - Verified signature
> - MD5 digest matched but tez-0.3.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha1 did not match
> gpg --print-md sha1 tez-0.3.0-incubating.tar.gz.  Assuming this is either a
> mistake on my part or it can be easily corrected when the release is pushed.
> - Built from source
> - Deployed to a single-node YARN cluster
> - Ran some sample Tez jobs
>
> Jason
>
>
> On 02/23/2014 01:31 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is
>> the second release for Tez.
>>
>> GIT source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>> repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=
>> refs/tags/release-0.3.0-incubating-rc0
>> Staging site: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tez/0.3.0-
>> incubating-rc0/
>> Nexus Staging URL: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachetez-1002
>>
>> PGP release keys: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
>> 0xA9510905F0B000F0
>> KEYS file also available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> dist/release/incubator/tez/KEYS
>>
>> One can look into the issues fixed in this release at:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ/fixforversion/12325655 or look
>> at the CHANGES.txt in the release tarball.
>>
>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours ( until the required number of
>> IPMC votes are obtained ).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> For folks not familiar with vetting a release, please refer to
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
>>
>> thanks
>> -- Hitesh
>>
>
>

Reply via email to