It means that unless Nathan Marz and an Yahoo! employee
added those items to the NOTICE, you can remove them.  But
if they did, than either Nathan Marz or a Y! employee should
be asked to.

In terms of being a release blocker, I’d say not.  If you fix
this in HEAD that should be sufficient to continue.

On Feb 15, 2014, at 1:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> With the exception of some JavaScript code [1], all source code files use the 
> Apache v2 license.
> 
> Prior to entering the incubator, the project used the Eclipse Public License. 
> In the incubator, all source files that did not have a license header already 
> (the JavaScript files mentioned above), were updated with the Apache v2 
> license header.
> 
> So from a LICENSE/NOTICE file perspective, where does that put us?
> 
> -Taylor
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:10 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi sebb,
>>> 
>>> What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
>>> 
>>> Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
>> 
>> As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
>> file(s) involved.
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Taylor
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If the code has not changed substantially in 2014 then the date can
>>>> stay as 2013.
>>>> 
>>>> As to the attribution, that depends on the _exact text_ of the license
>>>> provided with the files.
>>>> The license(s) should also be included in the LICENSE file.
>>>> 
>>>> Note that attributions in the NOTICE file must be passed to downstream
>>>> consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
>>>> required.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding) from me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
>>>>> think while it may not be necessary to call out individual or companies
>>>>> contributing large portions of the code, it should not block this release
>>>>> and can be addressed later.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:49 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the input!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The majority of the codebase was originally developed by Nathan Marz, and
>>>>>> it includes significant contributions from Yahoo!.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The project was originally licensed under the Eclipse Public License, but
>>>>>> has not transitioned to the Apache v2 license.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If putting those attributions in the NOTICE file is not the correct thing
>>>>>> to do, please let me know the right way to handle it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It was still 2013 when I last updated the NOTICE file. I'm not sure if
>>>>>> that is a blocker for release or not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Taylor
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 5:59 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
>>>>>> 0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes
>>>>>> (6
>>>>>> binding, 3 non-binding), no 0 votes, and no -1 votes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release Vote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c44c5baad-0fd8-454c-84d7-c8da92442...@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release Vote Result:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201402.mbox/%3c3a207f1c-3b07-4029-93d4-87abeb412...@gmail.com%3e
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.1-incubating:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=tree;h=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c;hb=ffc7a81bfba60c735dd6801af4f5e8db3812658c
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The NOTICE file also references software from
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nathan Marz and Yahoo!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However there are no corresponding licenses in the LICENSE file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does the source *contain* software from either of the above?
>>>>>> If so, where are the license files?
>>>>>> If not, why are the attributions present in the NOTICE file?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Remember that N&L file entries are only for bits that are actually
>>>>>> included in the distributiion.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The specific source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3/apache-storm-0.9.1-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-dist-rc3
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key available here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1002/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The generated reports and documentation for this release can be found 
>>>>>> here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ptgoetz/storm/storm-0.9.1-incubating-report-rc3
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 0.9.1-incubating
>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Apache Storm Team
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity 
>>>>> to
>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
>>>>> that
>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender 
>>>>> immediately
>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to