On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 08:49:55PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:49:51PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> +<p>Once the vote has been called the proposal should be considered fixed. > >> + No further changes are accepted.</p> > > > > Can I suggest that you make explicit the option to cancel the vote, amend > > the > > proposal, and re-start the vote? This document is facing "new" people who > > might otherwise get the false impression that once a vote is started, > > that's it > > --- "sink or swim", based on whatever the proposal was at that point in > > time. > > Hi Daniel, I'll volunteer to take point on documenting this issue. >
Thanks. > Therefore, unless there are objections, I plan to strike the material on the > "Process Description" page, leaving the only copy at the canonical location of > the proposal guide. +1 to the idea that policy should exist only at one, canonical location. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
