Bertrand, yes, I am not sold on the idea of doing it by default. But perhaps sort of advisory, highlighting it as an option, and giving reasons why it might be a good idea for some projects?
What would I have to do to add that? If I prepare a patch to the docs, would it be CTR or RTC? On 27 March 2013 08:54, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > ...As to whether such lists should be encouraged for new podlings > (probably by > > putting a stub in the proposal template alongside the other lists), I > can't > > say that I have a strong opinion.... > > IIUC Noah's proposal goes further and suggests creating an announce@ > list by default for every new podling. > > I'm against that - suggesting that podlings create it is fine (as long > as we indicate that there's announce@a.o. which is in general > sufficient) but the default setup of a podling should be minimalistic, > as each podling is different. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- NS
