Hello, I know at least one podling where 75% of the mentors is awol. We don't have an oversight on the "awol"-state, just the shepherds do know for the projects they shepherd.
We have status reports, which should be signed by all mentors. I believe reading, verifying and signing a podling report is not so much work and it is the least a mentor should do. My proposal: We should contact all Mentors who have not signed a report 2 times in a row if they are still committed to their role. If we get no response within a week, we should remove them as a mentor from podlings.xml (or give them an inactive flag). With this information clutch can report projects which do not have sufficient mentors. Thoughts? Christian -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
