On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's quite frustrating that people find time to write hundreds of mails > about points of procedure, but can't take time to review a release > tarball from a podling. > > Activity on Bloodhound is picking up, and the project wants to release > every couple weeks; yet the 0.2 vote thread sat in general@ for longer > than that. > > It's worse for these mails to go unanswered than if the release had been > vetoed. I hereby propose we extend the silent consensus rule to podling > release votes. > > -- Brane > > -1 for extending the silent consensus rule to podling release votes. BTW, have you got any IPMC binding votes from your mentors ? -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
