On 3 November 2012 17:22, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > 2012/11/3 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>: > > Hi again Mohammed, > > > > one think I am curious about the Git management for Mayhem is how to > > handle the fact that Mayhem is composed by components, like apache > > commons, each component has his own lifecycle. > > > > While on SVN I would have imported components in a structure like > > > > trunk > > `- component1 > > `- component2 > > `- component3 > > `- component4 > > tags > > `- component1-0.1 > > `- component1-0.2 > > `- component2-0.1 > > > > how the same structure can be replicated in Git? I am asking because I > > noticed on [1] that commons components have 1 git repo for each > > component. > AFAIK not possible (git is poor for supporting such sparse checkout mode). > So we (infra folks) will have to maintain one git repo per component > and create a new git repo for each new component (IMHO a pain ..). > In some case git is probably nice but not here ! > We have very similar situation in maven projects (with some components > which have their own lifecycle) and we decided to not move those parts > to git. >
YET you forgot the YET. We may still decide to move them to git ;-) > But hey what is most important build a community around cool > code/projects or being able to use the last "à la mode" scm tool ? > > > > > Many thanks in advance, all the best! > > -Simo > > > > [1] http://git.apache.org/ > > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Mohammed! > >> > >>> IMO it would be easier to move into a Git repository, which I will > help in > >>> setting it up. IMO, it will also be helpful for ASF Git support to have > >>> more projects using Git which will help us understand different needs > and > >>> use cases of different project to provide better Git support by time, > by > >>> better I mean that now it is really good IMO but for sure we can make > it > >>> better :) > >> > >> agreed! can you update the reference in the proposal, please? TIA!!! > >> > >>> > >>> The thing is we still need to have SVN for content related operations > like > >>> website and so cause it needs to be published using SVN pub-sub. I will > >>> collect more details about that > >>> > >> > >> thanks a lot! Can we propose the site be published on Git, like we > >> already did on GitHub in the `gh-pages` branch? WDYT? > >> > >> All the best, > >> -Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
