Uh, would be handy if I included my vote. ;)

An emphatic +1

On 30 October 2012 19:51, Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org> wrote:

> Sig: OK
> Hashes: OK
> RAT: OK
> Source: OK
> Build: OK
> Tests: OK
>
> (Based on my voting from yesterday during the project vote.)
>
> (See my post to this list yesterday about the about the waf file, which
> I believe to be resolved now.)
>
>
> On 30 October 2012 18:51, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
>> 4.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> This has been voted through on the cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
>> mailing list (vote thread at [1], results at [2]), and now requires a
>> vote on general@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> 5 IPMC votes have already been cast (on cloudstack-dev):
>>
>> +1 (PPMC / binding)
>> * Jim Jagielski (mentor)
>> * Olivier Lamy (mentor)
>> * Brett Porter (mentor)
>> * Daniel Kulp (mentor)
>> * Noah Slater (mentor)
>>
>> There were no -1 or +0 votes cast.
>>
>> Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure
>>
>> If you have any trouble setting up a test environment using the
>> procedure above, please ask on the cloudstack-dev@i.a.o list. Someone
>> will be sure to help, and we'll improve our test procedure
>> documentation at the same time!
>>
>> Now, on to the specifics of what we are voting on...
>>
>> The following artifacts are up for the vote:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0.0-incubating/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Branch: 4.0
>> Commit: 6355965dcd956811dd471a9d03c73dadcf68f480 (tagged as
>> 4.0.0-incubating)
>>
>> List of changes:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be
>> sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -chip
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/otomwu2pt75n6qbn
>> [2] http://markmail.org/thread/dg6mquboi65t2nho
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> NS
>



-- 
NS

Reply via email to