On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> ...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if
>> they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process....
>
> Agreed - we could just require a visible standard "incubating" logo on
> podling's websites.

We already require that, but it does not always happen (and getting it
fixed can be non-trivial).

I don't think it's a good idea to drop the incubator part of the name.

> -Bertrand
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to