Speaking as CouchDB's RM, I would consider missing license headers a blocker.
Are rules more lax within the Incubator? On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > I had a look and things mostly look good, but > > > > $ grep -L "Apache Software Foundation" $(find . -name *.java) > > > > finds a number of .java and .js files that are missing the Apache License > > header, for example under ./incubator-cordova-js.zip/lib/common/plugin/ > > > > I haven't checked files with other extensions - did the Cordova team run > > RAT to check those headers? > > Yes, that's one of the issues that came up during the review [1]. It's > already being resolved [2] for the next release. > > The community did a similar exercise already earlier [3], but some of > the more recent changes brought in new files without the copyright > headers. That's something to improve before graduation, but personally > I don't see this as a blocker for the present release. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/53m3msdrlclbyf56 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1477 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-639 > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- NS