Speaking as CouchDB's RM, I would consider missing license headers a
blocker.

Are rules more lax within the Incubator?

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I had a look and things mostly look good, but
> >
> > $ grep -L "Apache Software Foundation" $(find . -name *.java)
> >
> > finds a number of .java and .js files that are missing the Apache License
> > header, for example under ./incubator-cordova-js.zip/lib/common/plugin/
> >
> > I haven't checked files with other extensions - did the Cordova team run
> > RAT to check those headers?
>
> Yes, that's one of the issues that came up during the review [1]. It's
> already being resolved [2] for the next release.
>
> The community did a similar exercise already earlier [3], but some of
> the more recent changes brought in new files without the copyright
> headers. That's something to improve before graduation, but personally
> I don't see this as a blocker for the present release.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/53m3msdrlclbyf56
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1477
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-639
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
NS

Reply via email to