According to the mailing list, there hasn't been any coding activity for a very long time. Just about the only topic lately is about whether the project is retirement fodder. And even that can't get many people involved.
The only objection to retirement seems to be anxiety about whether a retired project can be forked. If the objector were to understand that any Apache project can be forked at any time, it seems that there would be no objection to retirement left. Perhaps the kitty community can replay the vote with a definitive outcome. On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > FYI, I'm including the following note about Kitty in this month's report: > > > > <report> > > Kitty is a lightweight, production focused, Java-based application server > > performance diagnostic and management utility. Kitty entered incubation > on > > October 3rd, 2010. > > > > A vote to retire the Kitty podling due to inactivity is in progress. > > </report> > > > > If you decide *not* to retire, please report next month on the outcome > > of the vote and your plans going forward. Otherwise see the retirement > > guide in http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html. > > I notice that the vote on retirement failed to reach consensus [1]. > > Since it looks like there has been zero activity in Kitty since the > vote and the requested followup report was not made, I think the IPMC > should take over and decide to retire the project. > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kitty-dev/201208.mbox/%3C9EBAC2D2-568F-4653-8D2B-5BE926A369B1%40gmail.com%3E > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
