Hi, On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the low > diversity trap while Incubator focuses on more process driven IP, release, > graduation.
Sounds good. > Of course this means we should figure our exactly what "low diversity" is. > As discussed recently low diversity is not a problem if the project can > demonstrate it is open to newcomers. Right. I'm even thinking that we should drop the "low diversity" label and simply replace it with a more generic "not yet ready to graduate" one until we have a better shared understanding of the things podlings falling into that category still need to do. > Given I committed to find a way for ComDev to support the Incubation > process do you think this is a starting point? Yes. Going through all the podlings in that category and trying to spot common patterns and areas of potential trouble or improvement would be my first step here. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
