Hi Kevan,
On Jul 13, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright
checklist item:
2009-02-09 kato
2009-02-13 stonehenge
2009-05-13 socialsite
2010-05-19 amber
2010-09-05 nuvem
2010-11-12 kitty
2010-11-24 stanbol
2011-06-13 openofficeorg
Said checklist item is:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. "
IIRC, there was no code grant/donation for Kitty. So, there was no
code grant. If that means I should indicate the 'papers have been
received', I can do that.
If there's no code base (pretty rare, from what I've seen) then the
"papers that transfer rights to ASF" could be subsumed by "committers
have all submitted ICLAs".
In this case, I'd tick the box and be done with it.
Craig
--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
