On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Personally, I agree with Roy. Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include > the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongside a more > permissive license), but the key here is that it is both legally OK for us to > distribute a product bundling such a dependency without explicitly justifying > our usage, and legally OK for a downstream consumer to distribute a product > bundling ours which asserts usage of the dependency under a different > rationale.
I prefer to put our license in the file and then, at the bottom, refer to a list of other licenses per dependency (if included in this package), wherein the dependency licenses are in separate files near the dependency. ....Roy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
