----- Original Message ----- > From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> > To: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> > Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:59 AM > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh > > On 15 February 2012 02:18, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >>> To: Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >>> Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org" > <general@incubator.apache.org> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:11 PM >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - > /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh >>> >>> On 15 February 2012 01:49, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> >>>>> From: sebb <seb...@gmail.com> >>>>> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer >>> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >>>>> Cc: >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:40 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - >>> /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh >>>>> >>>>> On 15 February 2012 01:30, Joe Schaefer > <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>> The documentation is in the caller script sebb. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but how can one find the calling script from the build > script? >>>> >>>> If you have problems with the level of detail provided in the > script >>> comments, >>>> please feel free to add your own commentary. >>>> >>>>> BTW, if the script is run at the moment, it will cause > problems. >>>> >>>> Well with svn 1.7 those problems have been outlined elsethread. > Hopefully >>>> we will have those resolved by the time the cms host is upgraded. >>> >>> I meant that until snvpubsub is implemented, running the script will >>> cause problems, as it starts by deleting part of the workspace >>> >>> I've just realised that it may also cause problems for the Ant > build, >>> as I don't think that expects to create any missing directories. >>> >>> The script should probably just delete files. >> >> I sure hope not. There is no good reason to expose this level of >> site structure micromangement to build system users. If ant doesn't >> know how to recreate the site starting from an empty site-publish >> dir, let's move the conversation to dev@ant to try and fix ant. > > It's the build script that will need fixing (if necessary), not Ant itself. > > It may be OK already; it may not.
It only takes about a minute to test this sebb, could you please look into this? All you have to do to restore your working copy is to nuke the publish-site tree again post-build and run svn up, even with svn 1.6, so really it's no big deal to try it out and see. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
