On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates and
see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate is odd.
Agreed.
I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election,
with all candidates be done.
What's preventing anyone from calling a VOTE on any other candidate? Of which,
as I understand it, there are none.
Noel is the existing chair. If this VOTE is *not* successful, then he remains
the chair.
If it is, successful, then the recommendation is to change him out as the chair.
Did I miss something by actually "trying" to make progress here?
For one, how or when would you call this vote successful?
If there is a +3, a majority of every IPMC member, a majority from only those
who voted, etc.
With Noel not being voted on *at the same time*, there is no proper comparison
possible on the result (votes for Jukka) and 'undetermined result (support for
Noel).
Ate
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
