On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people > lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto > authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this > PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel > votes are by straight majority consensus, iow no vetoes allowed. > > I intend to offer a policy vote on this issue over the coming > days and that vote, as with all procedural votes, is NOT subject > to veto.
Seems like a good idea. I did't realize that -1 votes were vetoes on such matters. I think that a -1 should carry the weight of a veto in the eyes of fellow peers such that a consensus would be sought. If both sides agree to disagree then the tally proceeds. > Any other rational opinions? As opposed to any other type of opinions? Really, I am getting quite tired of your loaded statements. Regards, Alan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
