On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Stuart Monteith <stuk...@stoo.me.uk> wrote: > Hi, > Does not having the report forwarded imply being pushed out of the > incubator? As far as I can tell, the point being made was that there was > nothing going on in the project, and so nothing should be reported - I'll > leave Benson to clarify.
Uh, oh, what have I done now? I don't even know which project this is referring to. It is certainly true that one -1 vote on one report does not boot a podling out of the incubator, that's for sure. I'd imagine that the appropriate response is to come up with an appropriate report. Shutting down the podling would be an *eventual* response to a problematic report or to complete silence in response to a request for one. > > I'll back up what Ant said - Robert and Ant have shown heroic patience as > mentors on this project. The situation will resolve itself one way or the > other soon. > > Regards, > Stuart > > > On 11 Jan 2012, at 23:05, ant elder wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> And here we return to a thread of some weeks ago. One chair can't >>>> review all those reports and push the bounce buttons. Some other >>>> people have to step up to help. >>> >>> This Board member reads each and every one of them every month. So it >>> is no change in workload to me to push this work down. >>> >>> Instead of talking about this abstractly, -1 on forwarding to the >>> board the following reports. I'll start with the most egregious one: >>> >>> -1 on forwarding on the Kato report. Here are prior reports from this >>> podling: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Kato.html >>> >>> Key excerpts: >>> Kato: >>> Jan 2012 >>> * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all. >>> Sept 2011 >>> * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all. >>> June 2011 >>> * Decide in what form the podling should continue, if at all. >>> March 2011 >>> * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established. >>> Dec 2010 >>> * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established. >>> Sep 2010 >>> * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established. >>> June 2010 >>> * To be determined once Oracle's involvement has been established. >>> >> >> I'm a mentor for Kato, and there is another mentor who is active, and >> we talk to them regularly about deciding what to do. I think they're >> close to deciding to retire the poddling and i think its likley thats >> what they'll be saying come their next report. I think its good if >> they can come to that decision by themselves rather than be pushed >> out, is it really causing any trouble to have them sitting there not >> doing very much in the meantime? >> >> ...ant >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
