> [ ] Forks are accepted without judgement [Greg] [1] > > [ ] [something more nuanced here] > > [X ] Hostile forks are never acceptable [Roy] [2]
I don't understand the purpose of a vote here. Roy has stated rather firmly that [2] is settled foundation policy. So, if someone wants to reopen that question, don't we need to go to the board for a vote? It's not an incubator issue, it's a contribution issue. Someone is proposing to check into svn code that fails the 'voluntary' test. Would some please clarify is this is *truly* a hostile fork? Is the copyright holder willing to grant, or not? That is, I claimed, a different question from 'there is a lack of consensus in the development community for a fork at Apache.' --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
