On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:02 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> ...I'm saying that the *ASF* should avoid judging. We allow competition among >> projects. We accept projects with hard problems and low chances of success. >> We accept projects that some don't want us to. We should not judge. We >> should provide a home to communities that want to be here. > > I have no problem with competition among projects and everything else you say > in the paragraph above. The only issue I have is that we can't take some > other project's code and use it as the basis for a project here if the > original project objects. It still isn't clear to me what the consensus is > at Trac, but it certainly isn't overwhelmingly in favor...
I agree that we don't want to support an unfriendly fork of Trac in Bloodhound, but as you say there doesn't seem to be an official consensus from the Trac project about this. IMO the best way of coming to closure on this issue is for the Trac community (as a whole) to state whether they agree with Bloodhound forking whatever they are planning to fork or not. Getting that agreement would, again IMO, be a condition for Bloodhound to graduate. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
