Thanks. I'm happy now. Ross
On 21 December 2011 12:50, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >>...I request a subtle, >> but important (for me), change in the wording of the proposal as >> follows: >> >> "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and websites should be >> allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their >> name - however such existing sites will be expected to conform to >> Apaches existing trademark policies >> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/)" > > Makes sense, thanks for this suggestion. I have rewritten that bit as > follows, do it work for you and others? > > "Existing Flex-related conferences, podcasts and websites should be > allowed to continue using “Flex” as part of their name, however such > use will have to conform to existing Apache trademark policies listed > at http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ . Apache Flex will need to > create guidelines and provide guidance for that." > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
