On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
> NOTICE document.  This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
> REMOVE".  I imagine they would even tear off those tags on mattresses.

Fully disagree:

"Do not modify or remove any copyright notices or licenses within
third-party works."

-- http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html

At times we have politely requested that the copyright holder remove
their headers; but if we can not get agreement on that we respect the
license terms under which the software has been offered.

> -Rob

- Sam Ruby

> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I support this idea.
>>
>> I think with regard to need for an SGA or not, there is the matter of the 
>> current headings at the tops of source files.  (I have no idea what is 
>> required, I'm simply
>> observing what is there.)
>>
>>  - Dennis
>>
>> "/************************************************************************
>> "*
>> "* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER
>> "*
>> "* Copyright 2008, 2010 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>> "* Copyright 2009, 2010 IBM. All rights reserved.
>> "*
>> "* Use is subject to license terms.
>> "*
>> "* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may 
>> not
>> "* use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy
>> "* of the License at http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0. You can also
>> "* obtain a copy of the License at http://odftoolkit.org/docs/license.txt
>> "*
>> "* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>> "* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
>> "* WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>> "*
>> "* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>> "* limitations under the License.
>> "*
>> "************************************************************************/"
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
>> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 12:43
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: d...@poi.apache.org; ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: ODF Toolkit Incubation Pre-Proposal
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Also, since this is already an open source project with all code under
>> Apache 2.0, I assume no SGA is required?
>>
>> So please let me know if you agree that Apache would be a good
>> location to further develop the ODF Toolkit libraries.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to