On 5 Jun 2011, at 19:15, Greg Stein wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 14:05, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> On 6/5/2011 10:43 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >>> I posted a similar statement yesterday. Personally, I think the traffic on >>> this list has settled down a lot in the last 24 hours and is now focusing >>> in on topics more relevant to this list. But maybe that is just because it >>> was Saturday :-) >> >> Agreed, just some quick thoughts... >> >>> What I am still waiting to hear on are: >>> 1. The amount of code in the project that the grant didn't give to us under >>> the Apache License. >> >> List published by Sam, and Christian suggests this reflects the OOo repo... >> http://people.apache.org/~rubys/openoffice.files.txt >> Actually tearing into that repo for files differently-copyrighted might >> be a task for RAT :) > > I doubt that you'll find anything "differently-copyrighted" in that > list. My understanding is that Oracle created the list with something > like "grep '(C) Oracle'" :-) > > I'm more interested in the list of files from the Hg repository that > are NOT in that list. I gotta believe it is non-zero, so what are > they, and how much of a problem will that be?
I've been discussing this privately with some folk, and while we've not done an exhaustive analysis between us we're fairly sure that list doesn't include any of the (numerous) work-in-progress branches that are not merged into the actual release. Is it crucial to get a comprehensive list before the podlet is established, or can ASF still sort this out with Oracle in incubation? S. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
