On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, dsh <daniel.hais...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Besides that, I was asking myself why Rob is the only one who could > >> > add such a tone to the proposal? If there would be consensus that open > >> > and proactive collaboration with other parties is important it's up to > >> > the community to add such a tone to the proposal. > >> > > >> > What do you think? > >> > >> The reason it is a wiki is exactly for this reason. Go for it! > > > > What are the exact rules, Sam? Those of us who aren't insiders will be > very > > reticent indeed about editing. > > Rules? :-) > > From http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html : > > "The incoming community needs to work together before presenting this > proposal to the incubator. Think about and discuss future goals and > the reasons for coming to Apache. Feel free to ask questions on list." > Got any special rules for where the incoming community is already divided? :-) > As long as people are constructive and working together, there will be > no interference. If it turns out that there are groups with multiple > visions, we can split this page into separate proposals. Defacement > of the proposal will be quickly reverted. > So to be clear, the wiki page for the OOo proposal is open for anyone to edit and not just Apache members or the project's proposers. S.
