On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, <robert_w...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote on 06/03/2011 02:33:21 PM: > > > > > Your proposed text also does not recognise possibilities for > collaboration > > to protect the OpenOffice consumer end-user community in the interim > while > > your project sorts itself out. > > > > > Can you state this in the form of a collaborative activity? I'm being > neutral as to the intent or particulars on the wiki. I'm noting the kinds > of activities. In the end the nature of the activity, with respect to the > license and ASF policy, not the intent of the collaboration, is what will > determine whether it is permissible. > > For example, mixing GPLv3 and Apache 2.0 with the intent of feeding > starving children is not permissible, but providing a library that Wall > Street tycoons can use to design butterscotch pudding swimming pools is > permissible. Saying "collaboration...to protect the OpenOffice consumer" > is not really sufficient. > > I made fairly detailed proposals on another thread which I was summarising with that phrase.
S.
