On 3 June 2011 19:47, Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > > > > > More than that, I'd like to see it as an objective to facilitate this > > collaboration. There's too much talk of just giving up and treating > > ideological division as a given... > Well, the ASF develops and releases software under the AL... that > *is* a given. If people are wondering if we would change our license > or even allow dual-licensing, then that is not going to happen. > > Not anything in particular about OOo. It's just the fact. >
Which is exactly why I say "we are where we are" and we should deal with it even if it is to agree to disagree on some things. Can we work together and resolve issues so that people can enjoy using FOSS office software? That is really the fundamental question. Are we committed to use the available resources within the constraints we have? If we can agree that we are a good way forward. -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications The Schools ITQ www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 You have received this email from the following company: The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
