+1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect
legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of
those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended
up with the wrong license/notice files. I also think it would be
better to change from having the binary distribution which wrappers
the two webapps to instead just release the two webapps on their own.
...ant
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Stefan Seelmann <seelm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> RAT report looks good.
>> Source distribution exists.
>> Binary distributions and WAR contain licenses and notices of included
>> libraries.
>>
>>
>> Some notes, maybe you can fix that in the next release: the war file
>> contains multiple NOTICE and LICENSE files in
>> - META-INF
>> - WEB-INF/classes
>> - WEB-INF/classes/META-INF
>> I understand that the files in META-INF contain licenses and notices
>> for all included libraries which is fine. But I don't know if the
>> files in WEB-INF are required.
>> Also please note that the WEB-INF/classes/NOTICE still contains the
>> ${pom.name} variable.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>
> Thanks Stefan, we will look into this for our next release.
>
> Others, we need one more vote here, any volunteers ?
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
