Hi Luciano, Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I think...
Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good. I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war First, note how there are redundant license files in WEB-INF/classes/LICENSE and WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/LICENSE (I've seen this same problem in another project. Can't remember how it was resolved). Also, I don't think the LICENSE information (in either file) is accurate. It needs to reflect the licensing information for the artifacts contained within the .war. However, I don't think it does... IMO, this merits a -1... --kevan On Nov 28, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone > release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish the release. > > Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release > artifacts of PhotArk. > > The artifacts are available for review at: > http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M3-incubating-RC1/ > > This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report, > and the Maven staging repository. > > The release tag is available at : > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/photark/tags/M3-incubating-RC1/ > > The podling vote thread is : > http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01082.html > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
