On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:46, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/9/28 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:24, David Bosschaert >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Great - let me see if I can make it part of a larger Aries build with a >> > shared parent pom, a pom in the root dir etc... >> > I'd also like to rename some things from Geronimo to Aries... >> >> Sure. >> I guess the first thing though is to decide on the svn layout. >> I think we should aim for a single trunk/tags/branches for now. >> This does no preclude having blueprint released separatly if needed, >> but this is another problem we can address later. >> > > Yes, I was thinking a single build system for now. The layout would be: > /pom.xml (references all the submodules), can be used to kick off a build > for everything in Aries > /parent/... (parent poms, I was thinking of taking the ones from Geronimo > Genesis as the starting point > /blueprint (blueprint submodule) > /xyz (other submodule)
Sounds good to me. We need to set up the trunk/tags/branches first I think. > >> >> > Finally, should we asking INFRA for a Hudson build? Or is this normally >> not >> > done for podlings? >> >> I guess Hudson should be ok. >> I don't think podlings can use Nexus for the release, but that needs >> to be double checked. >> >> > I will get back when the root pom.xml is there. Dan or someone else with > Hudson credentials can then enable. > > Cheers, > > David > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
