Follow up question, I assume our vote to accept the contribution is
still acceptable as well as the software grant from Paremus. So, the
only necessary action is to have Paremus submit a new, Apache compatible
archive. Is that correct?
-> richard
On 7/6/09 12:52 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
Ok, thanks.
-> richard
On 7/6/09 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to perform IP clearance on the Sigil project to Felix.
The contributed archive contains some embedded JAR files, one of which
is covered by AGPL, which is a modified version of GPL. I am told by
Paremus (the contributors) that only two minor classes depend on this
JAR and it could be easily removed from Sigil with very minor impact.
So, the question I have is, do we need them to submit a new archive
that
doesn't contain this code or is it sufficient for us to strip this code
before importing the contributed code to SVN?
GPL [AGPL] is viral. The entire archive is copyleft.
You need clear AL 2.0 submission by the original authors, with no pieces
of GPL code whatsoever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
