On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Tim Ellison<t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> 1. Any substantial codebase needs at least IP Clearance in Incubator, >> which is effectively just a record of where/when/how it came from, and >> an opportunity for Incubator PMC members to have a look and make sure >> that there is no flagrant IP issues. > > I never understood this part. Why is the Incubator PMC any more > qualified to decide if incoming code contains a "fragrant IP issue" than > the destination TLP PMC? After all, the TLP PMC are doing that check > continuously for the day to day contributions received.
As I said, I think it is "an opportunity" and not necessary "a responsibility", which I think should be at the "contributor" primarily and "receiving TLP" secondarily. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
