On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:14 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's interestingly ironic that the ASF has invested /substantial/ resources to counter a license grant that would require additional terms and conditions on any release of ASF software (e.g. Harmony, with respect to Sun's TCK terms and conditions), while many of the very same people who are invested in fixing that problem just voted to preserve additional terms and conditions on incubator releases.
Hmm. I'm not sure I follow you... How is this different from the ASF governing ASF projects? Aren't ASF policies "terms and conditions" which restrict the ASF projects? I don't see where this is a *bad* thing...
I may have voted to impose a policy on how Incubator projects release their binary artifacts, but that doesn't restrict or limit redistributions of their works by non-incubating projects (inside or outside of the ASF). So, from my perspective, they aren't similar at all...
--kevan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
