Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.8.0-incubating release

[Craig L Russell]

With regard to the format, the CouchDB team should decide whether to release in zip, tar, gz, or whatever format. Every community's user base is different and my only requirement is that the release includes sources in at least one format. Everything else is optional.

What concerns me is the mentors who have not voted (maybe old news?)

Craig

On Jun 22, 2008, at 5:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote:

And in my opinion, the vote is for the primary release artifacts and I'm perfectly fine with actually changing the checksums and/or signatures while the vote is open. If there are any +1 votes on the previous (correct but improperly formatted) artifacts I'd still count them. I've only looked at the .asc and .md5 checksums and they're ok (I don't use an automated md5 verifier).

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 04:26:50PM +0100, sebb wrote:

OK, in that case I agree, the Zip is not essential.

Great stuff.


of the MD5 and SHA files now, while the vote is still open?

--
Noah Slater, http://people.apache.org/~nslater/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

As no one has voted yet, would there be any problem with me updating the format

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature