Counting IPMC members who voted here and on buildr-dev, we have three +1 and
no -1.
Time to make that release.

Assaf

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Assaf Arkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Up for vote, the much-anticipated Buildr 1.3 release, the first official
> > Apache release of the Buildr project.
>
>
> Already voted on buildr-dev but a confirmation never hurts: a big +1.
>
> Matthieu
>
>
> >
> > The release vote passed within the PPMC with 6 +1:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-buildr-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL
>  PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > We're voting to make a release based on the source distribution,
> available
> > as both Zip and Tarball, here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/>
> >
> > Specifically:
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/buildr-1.3.0-incubating.tgz
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/buildr-1.3.0-incubating.tgz
> >
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/buildr-1.3.0-incubating.zip
> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/buildr-1.3.0-incubating.zip
> >
> >
> >
> > That source distribution was used to generate two Gem packages, for Ruby
> > 1.8.6 and JRuby 1.1, available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/distro/>
> >
> > The documentation generated for this release is available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/>
> > http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/buildr.pdf<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/buildr.pdf>
> >
> > The official specification against which this release was tested:
> > http://people.apache.org/~assaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/specs.html<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eassaf/buildr/1.3.0/site/specs.html>
> >
> > Assaf
> >
>

Reply via email to