On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:59 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02/04/2008, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
<snip> > > > I misspoke. Here's what I meant to ask: > > > > > > Do we need to 1) include all the licenses for all our dependencies in a > > single LICENSE file or can we 2) have our top LICENSE file which is ASL and > > then have individual LICENSE files for each library in the lib/ directory. > > > > > > > I'm not aware of a requirement for having only 1 LICENSE file. In fact, > the > > document says you don't have to append 3rd-party licenses to the LICENSE > > file. It does say you should put a pointer to the license files. So, IMO, > 2) > > is fine. Other Apache projects do this also. > > 2) is fine so long as the main LICENSE jar tells users where to find > the other license - i.e. it has pointers to the other licenses. AIUI this is not policy - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
