On Jan 16, 2008 11:17 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The wording in the Policy was deliberately non-procedural, as the > Incubator PMC decided that policy belongs in the policy document and > process belongs elsewhere. So as far as I'm concerned, this discussion > is not supposed to have an answer.
ok i've added a step to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#bootstrap. mentors are going to need incubator karma so really should apply ASAP. take a look and see if it's ok. > So Bill's analysis is as valid as anyone else's. I'd suggest that one > of the discussion issues for a proposal for a new podling is to look > at the proposed Mentors and discuss whether the proposed Mentors > should be voted into the incubator PMC before the proposal itself is > voted on. Not policy, mind you. Just something for those who know to > know. +1 - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
