On 14/01/2008, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Jan 14, 2008 12:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The NOTICE files need to be updated for 2008, i.e. replace 2007 with > > 2007-2008 on line 3. > > The release was rolled on Jan 4th and there are no code changes since > 2007, so I'd consider this at best a minor issue, probably even better > to let the date remain 2007.
Well, the Ant files seem to have been changed in 2008. > > The hash files use a format which is difficult to use, as the hashes > > may be split over two lines. > > Not a blocker IMHO, but something we may want to change in future releases. Agreed that it's not a blocker. The files can even be fixed manually if desired. > I guess the checksums were generated with default Solaris tools. You > can use "openssl md5" and "openssl sha1" to generate checksum output > in the format Sebastian described. Well, the format is closer, as the hash is not broken over two lines, for example: MD5(filename)= 464069695e3ac4998898d0633f8df032 > > Also the SHA1 hashes normally have the suffix ".sha1" rather than ".sha" > > Actually the suffix should be ".sha" and not ".sha1". See the "not > normative" policy (a recommendation? :-) described in > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#policy. OK, I had not noticed that. Clearly a lot of other projects have not noticed either as there are 213 sha and 776 sha1 files under /www/www.apache.org/dist/ - so my statement was literally correct ;-) > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
