On 10/28/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Kevan Miller wrote: > > > > +1. I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not. > > > > Thank you! Only votes of Incubator PMC members are binding. > Unless you are one we still need one more IPMC vote. Could > we have an IPMC member either confirm that Kevan's vote > counts or kindly check out the tarball and give us the last > binding yay?
Kevan is now officially IPMC so his vote is binding. Cheers, Matthieu Kevan Miller wrote: > > > > I did not build (or test). However, RAT and brief of inspection of > > source looked good. > > > > One comment -- I see that many source files contain Rogue Wave > > Software copyrights (e.g. src/access.h) and one source file contains > > an HP copyright (i.e. src/parisc/atomic.s). If at all possible, these > > copyrights should be removed from your source (by the copyright > > holder, of course) -- they are already in your NOTICE. Hmm. Although > > the HP copyright is 2002 in your source file and 1994 in your NOTICE > > file... > > > > --kevan > > > > With the exception of src/parisc/atomic.s all of the rest of the files > that bear the HP copyright are from 1994 (the HP STL). I'll update > NOTICE.txt to on trunk reflect the atomic.s date of copyright. > My understanding of the HP license is that it must appear in all > files so we wouldn't be able to remove it without HP's permission. > I'll have to check with Rogue Wave legal to see what they think > about moving our copyright notices to just one file. > > Thanks again. > Martin > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13461410 > Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
