Just one example of the community bending over back wards to accomodate Jim and Jeremy
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05118.html Please search for "chianti" in the archives to get the background. Basically the trunk was abandoned and the revolutionary "fork" was accepted *JUST* for community reasons. thanks, dims On 10/23/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Noel, > > FYI, I could plainly see who was working hard to co-exist and who > wasnt'. IMHO, the people who left clearly did not want to > play/participate. It was sacrilege to do anything that was against > their mental model of things had to work. > > My 2 cents. > > -- dims > > On 10/23/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim Marino wrote: > > > > > About seven months ago, BEA decided to pursue an alternative > > > direction with the other active independents working on SCA > > > at the time when our goals diverged from others in the community. > > > Speaking for BEA, we made it clear on multiple occasions that > > > while we wished Tuscany success, given the divergent interests, > > > we were satisfied with our decision to participate elsewhere. > > > It is unlikely we will revisit this decision in the future. > > > > This should be a cautionary tale to communities if a project cannot serve > > the interests of all its members. > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
