There didn't seem to be any curfuffle at all in floating the proposal
through the incubator. That's a good thing. Both containers are
heavily used, both originate from these parts and so it's somewhat
fitting they would like to return. I'll put up vote thread later today.
On 8 Oct 07, at 9:54 AM 8 Oct 07, peter royal wrote:
On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal
with some
interest. A couple of items:
1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus
yes, Loom was unsuccessful Phoenix fork. iirc, Plexus borrowed
concepts from Fortress more, but was mostly an independent
implementation
2) What about Apache Excalibur, currently home to the various
Avalon modules (framework, components, etc.)?
Excalibur can continue on as-is.. iirc, Excalibur had made
movements to have some of its components be framework agnostic? If
so, they'd run in Composer. (the Composer component model is likely
going to be very much like pico's, which just runs with pojo's)
-pete
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
