On 8/1/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is about sources, not binaries, right? If you don't include > > the source but only the binary (.jar), then the situation might > > be different. > > It's my understanding that the same applies to both source and binary. But > you're correct that the right place to go for verification of this (or > otherwise) is legal-discuss.
I think that's correct, if you check the ASL you'll see the following: *4. Redistribution*. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions: a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and "Source and Object form" are both mentioned and same restrictions apply, which is also the case for most open source licenses that we're able to redistribute I think. So binaries must be distributed with the reproduced license as well. Matthieu -- > Martin Cooper > > The combined LICENSE file is probably meant to avoid > > searching through all the source files in order to locate all the > > relevant licenses. But putting a reference into LICENSE shouldn't > > be that much of a burden either. > > > > Maybe ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > cheers, > > Roland > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
