Ted Husted wrote: > IMHO, unless there are trademark or licensing issues involved, there > should be no "Apache rules" about Java package naming schemes. Package > names are an arbitrary implementation detail, and the one and only > concern should be what makes the most sense to the individual > community. When it comes to implementation details, the controlling > "Apache rule" should be that "The PMC as a whole is the entity that > controls the project, nobody else."
There are rules, and then again there are guidelines. I don't think that a generic statement about packaging conventions is a bad thing to help projects new to the incubator. Adding a statement something along the lines of what you wrote above would be a good thing, so that PMC's know they have flexibility beyond the guidelines. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
