On 7/17/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/17/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/16/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's one missing license header in the src distro on IvyTaskTest.java, yep (need to add some new features to RAT sometimes soon to regain my advantage ;-) > Good catch, I missed this one. I'll update it for next release. good enough for me > and I think its now preferred to include all licenses in the one LICENSE > > file instead of having the separate LICENSE.jquery and LICENSE.jschfiles, > > but neither of those things are blockers. > > I took example on Ant, but I will put everything in the LICENSE file for > next release. yep i'm +1 comments (subjective) -------------------------- good release notes
Thanks! MANIFEST.MF is missing vendor-id Indeed, we'll take care of that for next release. i prefer source distributions to unpack to a different directory
(apache-ivy-1.2.3-src, say) from the binary distribution. there is an alternative school of thought but this means that unpacking over the top needs to form a harmonious overlay.
It sounds like a good idea. We'll discuss that further on [EMAIL PROTECTED], feel free to join if you want to defend your opinion :-) Xavier - robert
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
