On 4/12/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...There's just this one little tidbit - if the IPMC votes to *release* something, that something should then actually be released. "Release" has a specific meaning and we (have to) do "distribution at no charge to the general public" of them. I guess it's all in a name. The alternative is to *not* release something, and then there should not be a release vote, but a different kind of vote, or no vote at all....
Agreed, it's good for podlings to indicate whether they actually intend to release the bits that they're asking us to approve, or if it's just a step towards graduation, without an actual release. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
