On Friday 30 March 2007 17:45, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > We consider this release to be for resolving legal issues only, and > will not make it available to the general public. The reasoning behind > this is that we are still working on some major changes that need time > to mature in these weeks. These changes are a direct result of the > decision by the Wicket community to discontinue development on trunk > (a full discussion can be found here [3]). As such we discourage our > users to use this release, because it will not give them a stable > platform to work with.
I think the Incubator needs to know a bit more background around the Wicket struggles. 1. When Wicket came to Incubator, I got the idea that 1.x was for bug fixes and 2.0 is the new incompatible trunk for development at ASF. 2. The 2.0 development is hitting major resistence, for more factors than just change of package names to org.apache.wicket. 3. 2.0 development is sort of cancelled, and work is starting to back port most features in 2.0 to the 1.x lineage. Now, what is happening to the org.apache.wicket naming requirement of classes? This release request is still using "package wicket.*". How do you plan to handle this, to satisfy both the Incubator namespace requirement and users being upset over incompatibilities? Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
