Please let us know. I'll keep a watch out for speeding up the review and voting.
thanks,
dims
On 3/29/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken,
> The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
> introduced as part of the move to Apache, and was discovered by
> the users after the recent release. The fix is to update a few
> files in a JAR; i.e., provide a replacement JAR.
Sounds fine, but ...
> I don't recall seeing this sort of thing coming up before (though
> it probably has)
I'm sure that it has, e.g., for security fixes in other projects. But
AFAIK, we still have to vote on release artifacts, and that's what this
would be. And, yes, I do understand the sense of urgency.
Can you tell us in brief the nature of the problem and fix, and we can
quickly do the +1 for the replacement JAR? That's what would happen in any
other PMC. You said that you'd be doing the replacement on Sunday or
Monday, today is Thursday, so we should have the time to do this right and
expeditiously.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
