Here they are: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-608 https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-838
http://www.nabble.com/Maven-repository-problem-tf2811096s12049.html#a7851593 http://www.nabble.com/WSDL-First-example-tf2373483s12049.html#a6612649 http://www.nabble.com/Installing-loan-broker-bpel-example-tf2374581s12049.html#a6783204 http://www.nabble.com/Error-building-tooling-projects-tf2500901s12049.html#a6996849 http://www.nabble.com/Help-running-Maven-examples-tf2598289s12049.html#a7346692 Just a few notes: We have somewhat managed to lower the problems which were caused mainly by the examples shipped in ServiceMix distribution that did not include the incubating repository: this means that users could not even use our examples out of the box :-( While I think ServiceMix is known as being in incubator at the ASF (the distribution, main dir and all jars have incubator in their name, in addition to the incubator logo on the web site, disclaimers, etc ...), i have exchanged mails from people who do not understand what incubator is. They are really thinking it is a sandbox for non mature projects (i don't say community here): they are referring to code, so that it is clear that they don't get what the incubator is about. Usually, when you use maven to reference a project, you know this project, so that it seems quite unnecessary to force people to add the incubating repo in their pom, as they already know that the project is in incubation (even if they don't understand what it means, but this is another problem). For people who already understand maven, this is not a problem. For beginners, it is quite a problem to understand why this does not work. Some may post a mail to the mailing list, but how many did not and gave up ? While the incubator is a good idea, it seems that it is more difficult to build a community inside the incubator than outside, because of all the existing rules. And remember that the release early, release often mantra can not be applied on podlings, given the pain to release a project in incubation. Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Sorry, i lost you. this whole "we need podling artifacts in central > repo" because right now you are putting our user through a meat > grinder has no basis in fact. Am asking for JIRA issues, email threads > that show that this is indeed a serious issue and not just a made up > issue. Show me the evidence is what i am asking. > > thanks, > dims > > On 3/16/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 3/16/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Please see #1 item here: >> > http://marc.info/?l=incubator-general&m=117397443306478&w=2 >> >> Did you read #5 as well? It contradicts your point. >> >> -- >> Emacs 22 will support MacOS and CygWin. It is not yet decided, whether >> these will be used to run Emacs or the other way round. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
